Thinkatorium
Thursday, November 29, 2018
Teaching math
Saturday, October 7, 2017
An old dog can learn new tricks
I am currently piloting an Algebra 1 textbook from Big Ideas. I've been teaching math for 12 years (or so) and I spent a couple of decades before that reinforcing the idea that I know everything. So, when I started the year, I used the textbook the same way I always had. I teach the way I feel most comfortable and then use the book for problem sets. This week I decided to learn something new.
I read the suggested methodology in the book and took the kids through an exploration in the prescribed manner. The lesson was regarding graphing linear equations using intercepts. I started the kids off with a warm up: How many pairs of numbers have a sum of 7? I was surprised and delighted to see the responses.
First of all, all 30 freshmen were immediately engaged. I didn't see anyone not discussing the problem. Clearly they were intrigued. This was 8am Friday morning!
Then I started wandering around the class to see and hear what they were discussing. I noticed one student had simply written infinaty on his paper (the well known alternative spelling to infinity). At first I was not sure what he meant. Then another student called me over and asked whether he could use negative numbers as well as positive numbers. The light bulb started to illuminate over my head. I hadn't specified that you could only use whole numbers. With no restrictions, some of the kids became quite innovative.
Another student asked whether they could use fractions and yet another asked about decimals. I was so excited. In my classroom, kids are seated in groups of 4, so no matter who had the idea, others became aware of the possibilities very quickly.
I got the attention of the whole class and took some time to discuss the idea that based on my loosely worded question,you could have an infinite number of pairs. Then I asked students to limit themselves to non-fraction and non-decimal positive numbers.
I asked how many pairs again. Several students volunteered that you could have 4 pairs, 0+7, 1+6, 2+5 and 3+4. So then I asked the class whether 4+3 would be considered another pair. One girl loudly exclaimed, "mind blown."
After this warm up activity, we proceeded with the Exploration in the Student Journal where we guessed what pairs of numbers would satisfy the equation 3x + 2y = 6? Eventually one girl figured out that you could easily find a pair if you set x or y to zero.
All in all it was a very satisfying lesson. Thanks, Big Ideas!
Sunday, April 23, 2017
Video in the classrom: Flipgrid vs Seesaw
Here is a video that I made- as though I was a student- using Seesaw and my smartphone:
https://app.seesaw.me/pages/shared_item?item_id=item.ccd3a629-d249-4765-b44b-93eadb288e74&share_token=ZcIZ51oBQo2bUW4mvdMnWg&mode=share
If you compare the two videos, you'll notice that the Seesaw video was fuzzier. The Flipgrid app gave me the ability to use the flashlight feature on my phone to brighten up the image and the app also allowed me to touch the screen and reset the focus. The Seesaw app did not seem to have these features. Also, you'll notice that when I get the "share" link from each app, the Flipgrid app provides a much shorter, easier to read link. This will make a big difference when I'm trying to share videos with students via Twitter, remind.com or even by writing on the whiteboard.
Of course there are many more features that Seesaw has in their web application and so this is not meant to be an overall comparison of the two products. But for this one application, quick sharing of student videos, I'm liking what Flipgrid has to offer.
Saturday, August 27, 2016
Homework in the secondary math class
Of course, like any subject there are gray areas. The discussion shouldn't be, homework or no homework. To me, the concern should be, did the student develop an understanding of the material in class. If they did not, then choices must be made. The student can choose to be satisfied with the level of understanding that they gained in class or they can seek to develop a greater understanding outside of class.
And, the math teacher bears responsibility here as well. Math teachers can customize their curriculum to ensure that students get what they need in class. However, I believe that if we limit student activity to math class, compromises must be made. For me, I already feel that it is difficult to cover all the standards in the given number of days with homework. And, aside from standards, there is a certain level of pressure from the teachers of higher level classes to cover a large number of topics. So, in a particular environment, a teacher may have to choose between breadth of material and time constraints for students.
In a world where all teachers were perfectly autonomous, I would be happy to eliminate homework and cover fewer topics. Sometimes, I imagine if I was really smart, I would figure out a way to cover every topic in the given time and all kids would understand. But, I haven't figured out that way and I haven't read any paper or book from a teacher who has. If you are reading this article and you figured out how to cover every topic that Common Core requires in Algebra 2 in high school in the given number of days with no homework, please share your secret recipe. I suspect I am not alone, maybe there are others that could be enlightened as well!
I have another unique consideration and that is I teach in a block schedule. My students and I will complete all of Algebra 2 in about 90 days. We started end of August and we'll be done by end of January. Then, essentially, we start a new school year from Jan to Jun. There is a theory in this environment that you just provide 2 lessons every day, but, from my experience, kids don't learn that way.
Hope you don't mind my rambling, but I have more to say. There is also a difference between homework and other work that needs to be done outside of class. By the way, did I mention that I flipped my class? My homework is watching videos and taking notes and sometimes completing Khan Academy exercises. Classwork is where we solve problems together. So, I feel that homework is less stressful in my class, just watch videos and take notes. But back to my thoughts about other work outside of class. I put pressure on my students to come in outside of class to work on improving their understanding. I offer extra credit and I offer a variety of ways to earn it including finishing their classwork problems, studying for a test, reviewing the results of a test, Khan Academy and even some novel things like playing the game, Dragonbox. So, with me, I am asking my students to do homework and I am asking them to put in some extra time aside from the homework. Of course, not all students need to put in this extra time. Some attend class, do their homework and get the grade they desire. But, for students that are not getting the grade they desire, I feel they need to put in some extra time.
Don't know that I have any specific conclusion. Just wanted to write down and share my thoughts and see what others think.
Friday, February 12, 2016
My example of Common Core Mathematical Practice 1, "Make sense of problems and persevere in problem solving." A friend of mine posted this on Facebook:
The Problem
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Slates and Clickers
With that in mind, I shall proceed. So, a former student comes to me to ask for help with an upcoming Algebra 2 test. Last year when he took my class, he failed because of zero effort. Nevertheless, he was not a horrible kid and he felt comfortable coming to me for help this year. It's funny because he's not very happy with his current teacher and now he's regretting that he didn't try harder last year when he had me- in his mind, the more reasonable teacher.
He complained about the pace of the class with the new teacher. Two lessons per day, no review day before tests and sometimes two tests in the same week. Then he started getting into other details. He said the teacher used slates to allow students to try problems and then show their results to the teacher. The teacher would then point to each slate and say whether it was right or wrong. This frustrated my student quite a bit because he would be told that his answer was wrong, but not why it was wrong. It's interesting to me because the slate idea has been kicked around for a few years now and some people think it's a cure all. It's one of those ideas that sounds good, but it's questionable whether it really is beneficial for students. Of course, like many good ideas, the level of success is dependent on implementation as well.
In comparison, I've been having some great luck with my clicker system. It's a technology system that is designed to give instant feedback to students just like the slates do, with several advantages over the slates- and in some people's minds, several disadvantages. With the clicker system, I create quizzes using PowerPoint. Each slide has a question and several multiple choice answers. Every student in the class gets a remote control and I have an infrared receiver attached to my computer. When I display the question, students press a button on the clicker to "vote" on the multiple choice answer they think is right. After all the students have voted on a particular question, a bar graph appears that shows how many students voted for each answer. If I want, I can also show them which answer is correct. So, like the slate system, students get instant feedback. Unlike the slate system, students get multiple choice answers, so they have something to work toward. Of course some teachers would complain that students may reverse engineer the answers or may copy answers from a neighbor and I'll admit there are problems. But like anything, there can be implementation issues and they need to be worked on. So, I'll continue to work.
Friday, November 23, 2007
Re-engineering the Math Classroom (textbook technology)
I also inquired about newer, better test generators and they had a pleasant surprise. I had recently tried out the new test generator provided with some new textbooks we received, but a found it lacking. It was way too slow on my old dinosaur computer. And it was slow compared to the older test generator that I had been using. The only reason I was interested in a new test generator was because the old one didn't have enough questions to cover all the topics that we covered in the book. Also, I was hoping for more algorithmically generated questions versus static, database questions.
Well, I got lucky. Even though we had only recently received the new test generator, there was an even newer one that the vendor had available. They demonstrated it to me and it was awesome. It was fast and full of nice features. It did seem to lose some of the older features that I liked, but it had some cool new ones.
However, back to the online homework/assessment system. Over the years, I have used diagnostic exams from the Mathematics Diagnostic Test Project (MDTP) from University of California. They offer a nice set of tests that can be used for diagnostics, but also for benchmarking. Where are your students at when you first meet them and how do they improve after you're done with them? Well, the textbook vendor came up with an online assessment system that automatically diagnoses student weaknesses and then allows you, the teacher, to generate a list of remediation assignments and it will even let you pull together the files for the assignments and either print them or email them to the student!
These types of technology are bound to make teaching better and more efficient.